Thread:Solderq1/@comment-31219246-20170203212036/@comment-31219246-20170203214606

Nope. you understand 0 from what i say. nothing occurs faster than frames. but i can lower the time and ->observe<- lower than that. Or make the frames from taking 0.1 real life seconds to take 1 second or more for each frame, so i can observe the events better.

"by rapidly double-tapping the space bar" you see its not accurate way to measure events in 0.1 seconds, reflexes, eye finger coordination, will put you off way more than 0.1 sec.

I am well aware of the "reactor" measurement, its not that accurate. Best accuracy is when you see the processes and the actual frames tick in front of you.

Ok i am tripple digits in capmaing kid. I show you that "reactor measure" is not accurate, and i show you i do measures way better. So reverting back is just plain stubbornness infront of facts.

I have the actual numbers from the base arty tests

arty "born" frame 8

first fire frame 58

next frame 60

next 62

(recharge 50)

than next shoot 112, 114 and 116

and 2xrof arty tests

8-->58, 60, 62 (32 sec cooldown) 94,96,98 (cooldown) 130,132, 134

50 cooldown. and 2xrof 50x0.8x0.8= 32 as measured.